Thanks very much for all the answers. JD
On Oct 3, 6:24 pm, Dan Stromberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You don't necessarily need thesubprocessmodule to do this, though you > could use it. > > I've done this sort of thing in the past with fork and exec. > > To serialize the jobs on the machines, the easiest thing is to just send > the commands all at once to a given machine, like "command1; command2; > command3". > > You can use waitpid or similar to check if a series of jobs has finished > on a particular machine. > > An example of something similar can be found > athttp://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~strombrg/loop.html > > (If you look at the code, be kind. I wrote it long ago :) > > There's a benefit to saving the output from each machine into a single > file for that machine. If you think some machines will produce the same > output, and you don't want to see it over and over, you can analyze the > files with something > likehttp://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~strombrg/equivalence-classes.html. > > On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 16:46:20 +0000, JD wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I want send my jobs over a whole bunch of machines (using ssh). The > > jobs will need to be run in the following pattern: > > > (Machine A) (Machine B) (Machine C) > > > Job A1 Job B1 Job C1 > > > Job A2 Job B2 etc > > > Job A3 etc > > > etc > > > Jobs runing on machine A, B, C should be in parallel, however, for > > each machine, jobs should run one after another. > > > How can I do it with thesubprocess? > > > Thanks, > > > JD -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
