David Tremouilles wrote: > "crappy", "waaay better" > I will not feed the troll... > Pygtk on mac just do the work for me on a more than satisfying way. >
If that's the case, good for you. If your application is open-source, then perhaps it's not unreasonable to expect your users to adapt to the way you do things--and there are enough Unix-savvy Mac users who won't be put off by an X11-based app. (Heck, I use Gimp and Inkscape all the time!) However, if you want to develop your application commercially, *very* few Mac end users, even Unix-savvy ones, will pay for an X11-based tool. I know I've opted not to purchase WingIDE, for instance, because it's X11-based (PyGtk in fact) and because I can find plenty of Mac-native programming tools. The interface quirks of the free Gimp are tolerable because Photoshop is several hundred dollars, but I am not willing to pay a few hundred dollars for a commercial tool that has the same interface glitches. Kevin Walzer Code by Kevin http://www.codebykevin.com -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
