Riccardo T. wrote:
> Scott David Daniels ha scritto:
>> Riccardo T. wrote:
>>> Scott David Daniels ha scritto:
>>>> [in the .png]
>>>>> ...
>>>>> Callable types
>>>>> ...
>>>>> User-definet methods
>>>> I personally prefer "User-defined methods"
>>> That's a typo, thank you.
>> Hope I didn't offend (I was simply trying to be cute).
>> Some from a bit further along. I know I didn't say so
>> explicitly, but I don't spend much effort in pointing out
>> errors in useless things.
>
> No, you did't :)
>
>
>> ---
>> lambda is an expression, not a statement.
>
> I'll remove that from the expression list.
>
>
>> Might include callable-invocation in operators?
>
>> divmod, pow, int, long, float are in __builtin__, not math.
>
> Yes I know, it has already been signaled by mail. They will be removed
> in the next version, except pow (the version with two arguments that is
> in my list belongs to math, while pow(b,e,m) is from __builtin__).
>
>
>> Note pow(base, exponent[, modulus] is good for crypto stuff.
>> Useful modules to read actually should include __builtin__,
>> os, and os.path -- maybe include os.walk and os.path.join.
>
> Maybe I'll add __builtin__ and os in place of the type hierarchy, but
> I'm not sure about that. However, not in the next release. What do you
> think about?
How about:
top line w/ __builtin__, os, os.path (and no contents -- inspire
further reading).
On left for numbers:
Numbers
long (big integers e.g. 9876543210L)
int (plain integers e.g. 123)
bool (booleans 0==False, 1==True)
float (floating point)
complex (e.g. 9j)
Similarly str, unicode, tuple, list [that is, the precise type name]
int (plain integers like 12)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
