On Jan 7, 5:09 pm, "Reedick, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bingo. Perl has specific operators to establish intent: > > Perl -e "'1' + 1" > > 2 > > Perl -e "'1' . 1" > > 11 > '+' is the operator for addition > '.' is the operator for string concatenation > > int and string comparisons also have specific operators: > $a == $b # compare as integers: ==, >, <, <=, >= > $a eq $b # compare as strings: eq, gt, lt, le, ge > > Which now morphs the conversation into the issue of how too much > operator overloading creates confusion and/or ambiguity. > Or how using different operators for similar operations on different types causes confusion. i.e. == versus eq; > versus gt If Perl had, for example, a complex number 'base' type would that need yet another set of operators? Well enough Perl vs Python. The thing is, that when writing in another programming language you have to use its idioms or you end up fighting the language in attempt to make it work like another language you are more familiar with. In Python strings won't ever automatically change to numbers. - Paddy. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
