2008/1/7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > You are too late, any and all are built-in into python 2.5 > > Hi, excellent. Now how about something more generic, possibly: > > [ x.y() for x or _next_ in c ] > > where the context of _next_ is limited in complexity, and/or can only > occur in a generator?
Would you care to explain what that syntax supposedly means ? By _next_ you mean something like the next method in generators ? _next_ executes if x is false ? so whatever _next_ returns is named as x, so you can call x.y() ? I really didn't get your new syntax inside that list comprehension, neither its uses. > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > -- -- Guilherme H. Polo Goncalves -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
