2008/1/23, Arnaud Delobelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Jan 23, 10:18 pm, "Guilherme Polo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2008/1/23, Arnaud Delobelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > The only way I can think of would be to create a metaclass, but I > > > don't think it's worth it. super(A, obj).__init__() isn't that bad! > > > > Metaclass doesn't apply here because metaclass is related to > > class-construction. This is related to instance initialization, and > > I'm creating the types as the user asks. > > Not completely clear to me what you want but here is a 'proof of > concept': > > ========== > > class callsuper(object): > def __init__(self, f): > self.f = f > def __get__(self, obj, cls=None): > def newfunc(*args, **kwargs): > super(self.cls, obj).__init__() > return self.f(obj, *args, **kwargs) > return newfunc > > class Type(type): > def __init__(self, name, bases, attrs): > for attrname, attr in attrs.iteritems(): > if isinstance(attr, callsuper): > attr.cls = self > > class A: > __metaclass__ = Type > def __init__(self): > print "init A" > > class B(A): > @callsuper > def __init__(self): > print "init B" > > ========== > > >>> b=B() > init A > init B > > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list >
Thanks for this concept, works better than mine :) -- -- Guilherme H. Polo Goncalves -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
