On Feb 6, 10:54 pm, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'd suggest a small improvement: _A as a class name isn't very nice.
> Replace the inner class statement with:
> _A = type(self.__class__.__name__ + '_autoprops', (self.__class__,), {})Ah yes, that's much nicer. > A problem with this approach is that instances aren't pickleable (perhaps > that could be solved using __reduce__) I think because the properties can be computed from knowing the rest of the data of the object, it would be safe when pickling to just pickle a copy of the object with the __class__ changed back to A (and then when you load it again, you can just generate the properties anew). I haven't really thought much about pickling but it would certainly be a nice feature to have. -- Dan -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
