Roy Smith wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Of course, but ROT13 ^ (2n*1) is equivalent to ROT13 for all positive >> integer n. > > Why restrict that to positive integers? I believe it works for all > integers. But I do think you meant 2n+1, not 2n*1.
Yes, I did. "*" and "+" are much closer in my mind than they are on the keyboard :-) regards Steve -- Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC http://www.holdenweb.com/ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list