>>>>> "Torsten" == Torsten Bronger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> There would be keywords for static and class methods, no
>>> distinction between Unicode and non-Unicode
>> You couldn't do that 15 years ago because there were no Unicode
>> that time.
Torsten> I've never said that Guido was just too stupid at that
Torsten> time. I only said "but you can definitely see that it's
Torsten> the oldest one". In other words, a Ruby six years older
Torsten> than the real one would have the same problem. And who
Torsten> knows how C# looks like in 10 years.
http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?PythonVsRuby
seems to suggest that Python has better Unicode support than Ruby.
--
Ville Vainio http://tinyurl.com/2prnb
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
