On Apr 25, 3:27 am, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That seems a little harsh: it's Python-in-a-strait-jacket. > > The fact remains that since RPython programs also run under the standard > interpreter (albeit a factor of maybe a hundred times more slowly) their > claim of self-hosting is valid.
What is the smallest subset of Python needed to make a Turing complete computer language? And would you still call that Python? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
