On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 03:29:49PM +0200, Diez B. Roggisch wrote: > Nick Stinemates schrieb: >>> While I certainly prefer to use Python wherever I can, that does not mean >>> that there aren't cases where legacy systems or other constraints make >>> this impossible. If I have e.g. a type3-based website - "how on earth" >>> should I replace that with Python (without wasting a lot of time)? >> I don't understand how the 2 are mutually exclusive? >> You can have PHP and Python bindings installed on the same Apache >> server, unless I'm mistaken? > > What about having to set up & maintain (which might not even possible on a > cheap hoster) two configs for that - just for having a few lines of python > being run? And how do you go about session-state sharing and so forth? > After all the scipt might need to be access controlled based on login > state. > > I don't say that there aren't options to run python more direct. I > argumented against a rather bold statement of Mr. alexelder: > > """ > A simple yet dangerous and rather rubbish solution (possibly more of a > hack than a real implementation) could be achieved by using a > technique described above: > """ > > Diez > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Don't cry me the river, I was just asking about his situation. If there's a specific problem with using python, then write it in PHP?!? -- Nick Stinemates ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://nick.stinemates.org -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
