"Aahz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >The proposed names could possibly be improved (perhaps tally() is more active
> >and clear than count()).
>
> +1 tally()
-1 for count(): Implies an accessor, not a mutator.
-1 for tally(): Unfriendly to non-native english speakers.
+0.5 for add, increment. If incrementing a negative is unacceptable, how about
update/updateby/updateBy ?
+1 for accumulate. I don't think that separating the two cases -- adding to a
scalar or appending to
a list -- is that essential; a self-respecting program should make this obvious
by the name of the
parameter anyway ("dictionary.accumulate('hello', words)" vs
"a.accumulate('hello', b)").
George
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
