Paul Boddie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anyway, I'm just confirming that I'm clearly not one of the "many" > described above. A lot of my own work is licensed under the GPL or
I guess it's safe to assume that you are not opposed to using code based on more liberal license, right? :-) My point is: GPL is a reason to reject a tool for some, but MIT/BSD never is. Ultimately, of course, it's up to the preferences of the author but if the idea is to maximize the popularity, GPL is a worse bet. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
