On May 17, 9:22 pm, castironpi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 17, 5:35 am, Ivan Illarionov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sat, 17 May 2008 02:57:08 -0700, castironpi wrote:
> > > Full day later, I think it, to emphasize state, would prioritize
> > > context. The reason for the huge ramble was, believe it or not,
> > > namespace conflict... as though any other states around here might nose
> > > in. And thanks to 'inhahe' for coming back with the question. ...Which
> > > would explain next move to 'prioritize context'. Context is a high
> > > priority for people.
>
> > > I'm proposing to start on one on a computer. The first things a
> > > computer 'knows' are the boot, keyboard, & mouse. Yet on another scale,
> > > the first things it knows are BIOS, file system, and OS. On still
> > > another, the only thing it knows are interruptions. Knowledge is
> > > important to context. (The scales are ram on disk on, ram on disk off,
> > > and ram off, which may tell of the currency they and their power are
> > > bought with. Thence, we should be getting different values for lengths
> > > of time.)
>
> > > (Furthermore, we're all on different longitudes -and- latitudes.)
>
> > > Context comes from motion, perception, and composite perception
> > > (reperception e.a.o. memory). There is some reason to believe that
> > > motion and sight are different senses, perhaps so with stationary sound
> > > (gatcha) and mobile sound too. Do you go deaf of a tone after prolonged
> > > duration? That makes computers valuable commodities*: they have a
> > > symbolic interface, which no other unlive objects have. They have both
> > > mouse and keyboard.
>
> > > *I'm sure there is a precision to wants: what magnitude of what types of
> > > action a person wants from a day and for a time-- what energy states
> > > they go to and from (note phone on come to and come from.)
>
> > > Therefore, context should originate in mouse and keyboard.
>
> > > Humans have symbolic know-how: knowledge of how to convey intent
> > > digitally, though it may be there is no interpolation of 'intent per
> > > mouse-or-key', even though people are prone to empathize with faces.
> > > However, if you start with a 'me' and a 'no', you can get pretty
> > > logical.
>
> > > Intent per mouse-and-key isn't necessarily scalar, three-dimensional, or
> > > rationally dimensional (?), though they do have magnitudes per mass and
> > > volume. The contingent of 'rationally dimensional' is having or
> > > beknowing/benouncing an orthonormal basis. Incidentally, '''orthography
> > > of a language specifies the correct way of using a specific writing
> > > system to write the language. .. Orthography is derived from Greek ὀρθός
> > > orthós ("correct") and γράφειν gráphein ("to write").''' - wikipedia.
>
> > > Further incidentally, context and state may have more important in
> > > common than priority and price: privacy and safety are involved ex
> > > hypothesi. Incidentally = ...
>
> > > It is not clear that the first (cheapest best) human-computer language
> > > is a computer language, though if two were orthonormal in comparison to
> > > life, Python's fine. Not my first.
>
> > > In privacy concerns, it is not clear that duals aren't primitives to
> > > humans. What's a brain primitive? Lol: what is a primitive brain?
>
> > > On May 16, 10:58 am, "inhahe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> I'm not an expert in this but what does it mean to emphasize state? It
> > >> seems the opposite of that would be a) functional programming, and b)
> > >> passing parameters instead of using global or relatively local
> > >> variables. And maybe c) coroutines (generators as implemented in
> > >> Python), although perhaps coroutines could be said to emphasize state
> > >> inasmuch as they go out of their way to capture, objectify and reuse it
> > >> (Stackless' microthreads, even moreso). And Python seems to be
> > >> well-noted for implementing some functional programming methodology,
> > >> and as for passing parameters it's just as object-oriented as the rest
> > >> of them.
>
> > >> But as I said, I'm not an expert, so let me know if I've gone astray..
>
> > >> > I have a proposition to ask you all: Python emphasizes state. Is it
> > >> > true?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > Castironpi,
>
> > I love you! You remind me of all the kittens and puuppies I had when I
> > was a child.
>
> > I #define this. Hope your database could give us something funny again.
>
> > -- Ivan- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> I have to talk about crossing threats. But talking about threads is
> like talking, and people talk about food. What are some threats to be
> scared of? What about threads to be thunder?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
I have to question sincerity, which is disappointing for a night.
Does anyone live in a city?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
