Nick Craig-Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Hmmm, 10,000,000 cycles (40 ms @2.5GHz) is nowhere near the ~90,000 >second jump in time.clock() output reported by the OP. I wonder if >there could be a different cause?
Just wild theorizing, but it's possible that they are actually getting a negative delta, and some kind of signed/unsigned manipulation produces the 90,000 number. -- Tim Roberts, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
