I see a new function in (python 2.6) lib/collections called
namedtuple. This is a great function. I can see many places in my
code where this will be immensely useful.
I have a couple of suggestions.
My first suggestion is to use self.__class__.__name__ instead of the
hard-coded typename in __repr__, so that subclasses don't have to
override these methods just to use the correct name.
def __repr__(self):
return self.__class__.__name__ + '(%(reprtxt)s)' %% self
\n
My other suggestion, which is perhaps more intrusive, would be to
implement the underlying class as a metaclass, rather than
constructing and exec'ing a string. This would make the code more
readable (as there wouldn't be format string substitions in the class
definition, and the code could be interpreted by editors for syntax
highlighting, indentation support, etc).
I'm willing to take up the latter effort if there's agreement this
could be included in the release.
Regards,
Jason R. Coombs
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
