Well, here is the whole problem. It works perfectly. We are using a 3rd party automation program. Basically instead of print() i used a test.log() command that feeds into the 3rd party program and gives me output. I can sort output by date, time, category, etc. As you've seen, the program runs fast. So we have basically 20 iterations in a second. When i sort by time, it sorts by string (output) b/c there are 20 outputs in a second.
Thanks all. On Aug 14, 12:07 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers <bruno. [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > korean_dave a écrit : > > > Still the same output... > > "same" as what, with what ??? Do yourself (and the world) a favour : > learn to quote the posts you're answering to. > > > Here's the actual code... > > > for x in range(0,2): > > for y in range(0,27): > > for z in range(0,15): > > print(str(x) + " " + str(y) + " " + str(z)) > > I fail to see how this code could generate what you described in your > first post. Did you ever bother to *try* this code ? Python ships with > an interactive interpreter , you know, so testing simple code snippets > like the one in your first post or this one above is, well, *very* easy. > > Also and FWIW, Python has string formatting and much more to offer. > > for x in range(2): > for y in range(27): > for z in range(15): > print "%s %s %s" % (x, y, z) > > or > > print "\n".join( > "%s %s %s" % (x, y, z) > for x in range(2) > for y in range(27) > for z in range(15) > ) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
