I'm not aware of possibility that works as you first expected. You yourself
explained why.

But _maybe_ you can use lambda here - that creates the layer  of indirection
one needs.

foo = property(lambda self: self.get_foo(), lamda self,v: self.set_foo(v))


Great. I'll think about this and decide which is better - lamba or private functions. Lambda seems much
shorter but it is not as clear why it is there. :-)


On second thoughts, a metaclass _might_ help here - but it would be rather
elaborate: look in the baseclasses for properties that have getters and
setters of the same name as some methods in the current class, and replace
them, or create a new property with them (I'm not sure if descriptors
allow changing their get/set/del methods). I'm not 100% sure if and how
good that works (a quick hack would be easy, but to ship around the cliffs
of multiple inheritance requires more careful navigation I fear...)


Yes, I feel the same. Using a metaclass could be a small help but rather elaborate and probably much slower.
Thank you for your help.



-- _________________________________________________________________ Laszlo Nagy web: http://designasign.biz IT Consultant mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

                Python forever!


-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to