* Lawrence D'Oliveiro (Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:47:54 +1300) > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Thorsten > Kampe wrote: > > * Lawrence D'Oliveiro (Mon, 06 Oct 2008 23:18:10 +1300) > >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Thorsten > >> Kampe wrote: > >>> * Lawrence D'Oliveiro (Sun, 05 Oct 2008 22:13:46 +1300) > >>> > >>>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michel Claveau - > >>>> NoSpam SVP ; merci wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Another way is to de-activate UAC. > >>>> > >>>> Please don't be stupid! > >>> > >>> He's not stupid. Disabling UAC is the recommended way to get rid of > >>> these problems. > >> > >> Disabling UAC is NOT recommended. > > > > YOU don't recommend it. I don't "recommend" it either - all the > > people I know (and this includes Microsoft techsupport people) do it > > anyway without recommendation. > > I find that hard to believe. Any company that would spend so much time > and effort developing and promoting such a feature on one hand, while > quietly disabling it on the other hand, would have to be sick.
You can believe what you want. The people who developed UAC don't have to support it. T. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
