On Nov 17, 11:40 am, Matt Nordhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That study has been disputed; see the links at the top of > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia>.
Now, if there was any independent refutation of the original study that isn't based on Britannica's - not that I'm outright accusing them of any bias here :) - that might make a reasonable disputation... -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
