On Dec 8, 2:55 pm, Arnaud Delobelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > class C:
> > def createfunc(self):
> > def self.func(arg):
> > return arg + 1
>
> > Or, after the class definition is done, to extend it dynamically:
>
> > def C.method(self, arg):
> > self.value = arg
>
> > ...which would be the equivalent of the following:
>
> > def method(self, arg):
> > self.value = arg
> > C.method = method
>
> What about the following then?
>
> functions = {}
>
> def functions['square'](x):
> return x*x
>
> def functions['cube'](x):
> return x**3
>
> --
> Arnaud
I agree that it's an extension (extrapolation) of the 'def self.meth'
notation. For 'func_name', would you use the quoted string? Would
you allow arbitrary expressions for the string, and the dictionary to
add to? For example:
def dict_val( )[ "name%i"% int_val( ) ]( self, arg, arg, arg ): ...
It's not much worse than: (Unproduced)
def anon( self, arg, arg, arg ): ...
dict_val( )[ "name%i"% int_val( ) ]= anon
#or if you really want the target before the def:
@assign( dict_val( ), "name%i"% int_val( ) )
def _( self, arg, arg, arg ): ...
And the latter are already both legal. But there have been PEPs
accepted before that abbreviate 2 lines into 1.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
