On Jan 2, 6:15 pm, [email protected] wrote: > On Jan 2, 7:20 pm, Ben Finney <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > vk <[email protected]> writes: > > > > If there were, I would expect it to conform with PEP 8 (get those > > > > ugly camelCase names outta there :-) > > > > haha, please forgive me. > > > I'll try and think of some more creative names. > > > They don't need to be creative; they merely need to conform with the > > naming scheme as laid out in the PEP. > > If it's something to be included in the standard library, I agree > (just for consistency, not because using_underscores is better). > > But for user code, I prefer mixedCase. > > +1 for mixedCase! > > Sebastian
I agree. I find underscores in variable names to be both ugly and harder to read. At first glance, the underscores are easy to miss. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
