On Jan 20, 10:18 pm, James Mills <prolo...@shortcircuit.net.au> wrote:
> I never did say that python -is- suitable for > all applications or that all languages are suitable > for all purposes. But you did make some rather outlandish statements. I had written this: > I suggest you call Boeing and tell them that encapsulation is more > trouble than it's worth for their 787 flight software. But please > don't do it if you ever wish to work for them, because you will be > proving conclusively that you don't have a clue about the kind of > software systems they produce. And you wrote this little gem in reply: I am 100% confident that those same systems could be well written in a language such as Python and would very likely end up being much smaller and more manageable. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
