Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
i look forward to seeing the same incremental improvement applied to
the development of python, evidence of which would be clearly seen by
the acceptance of one of the following patches, one of which is dated
2003:
http://bugs.python.org/issue841454
Against 2.3, rejected due to dependence on SCons.
Also appears to have been incomplete, needing more work.
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
Open by Roumen Petrov, no review, see below.
http://bugs.python.org/issue3871
Open, from same submitter, only (minor) review by you.
Does this supercede 3754?
http://bugs.python.org/issue4954
Yours, Martin reviewed and closed.
FWIW, the comment about not adding 'minority' platform specific stuff to
the core (as opposed to 'neutral' changes that make them easier) was
also applied, a week or two ago, to the BEOS successor.
I added 5026 as superceder.
http://bugs.python.org/issue5026 # number corrected
Successor to 4954
for those people wishing to track and contribute to the development of
python for win32 using entirely free software tools, either under wine
or native windows, there is a git repository, here, slightly
illogically named pythonwine because that's where i started from
(cross-compiling python under wine, so i could get at the wine
registry from python). obviously, since then, things have... moved on
:)
http://github.com/lkcl/pythonwine/tree/python_2.5.2_wine
Are there 'neutral' changes to the core you would like that would make
maintaining this and other platform-specific patch sets easier?
Terry Jan Reedy
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
