Jesse Noller wrote: [...] > So yes, I see Steve's point - multiprocessing *was* disruptive, and it > inclusion late in the game siphoned off resources that could have been > used elsewhere. Again, I'll take the responsibility for soiling the > pool this way. I do however think, that python 2.6 is overall a > *fantastic* release both feature wise, quality wise and is quite > useful for people who want to "get things done" (tm). > Overall I completely agree. And I don't think the decision to include it was down to you anyway, though you were certainly urging it. It was a release management issue. And 2.6 *is* a good release.
> Now I'm going to go back to fixing bugs. > Don't forget those PyCon talks! regards Steve -- Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC http://www.holdenweb.com/ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
