On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Volodymyr Orlenko <orle...@gmail.com> wrote: > In the patch I submitted, I simply check if the name of the supposed module > ends with ".exe". It works fine for my case, but maybe this is too general. > Is there a chance that a Python module would end in ".exe"? If so, maybe we > should check specifically for "pythonservice.exe". But then, if someone > renames the executable (as I did, because I wanted to see meaningful service > names in the process list), the patch will not work. Maybe there's another > way to fix the forking module?
I believe the best way to fix this is to fix the underlying issue that Mark has pointed out (monkey-patching mp won't do). --JamesMills -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
