On Feb 10, 9:19 am, "Gabriel Genellina" <gagsl-...@yahoo.com.ar> wrote: > You really should push them to be included in python.org, even in their > unfinished form. (At least a link in the wiki pages). Their visibility is > almost null now.
It looks like I made an unfortunate choice with the title ("Things to Know about Super"). I have just changed it to "Things to Know about *Python* Super" so that now googling for "python super" should hopefully find them. I agree that the real solution would be to publish on python.org, but for that I have to write yet another paper about Python 3.0 super, cut things about old version/bugs of Python, re-read the whole beast, and convince the core developers to publish it (which is not automatic). That is some work, and I have many other projects going on right now. Truth is, discussions about super do not come out so often, and most people don't care. > They're very clearly written - I wish you had published them years ago! Me too, but you know what happens when working for free and without deadlines ;) > again, you really should publish the > series in a more prominent place. Soon or later I will go back to super in Python 3.0, but now I am working on my Scheme series, I have yet to translate two articles of my "Mixins considered harmful" series, and I have at least two other articles which has been waiting publication for more than one year. Plus, I have a full time job ;) But if you and others keep bugging me something may happen ... Michele Simionato -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list