On Mar 7, 5:09�pm, Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> wrote: > Python Nutter wrote: > > silently troll python submitters and got the feeling 3.1 was what 3.0 > > was supposed to be ;-) > > I would say that it will be what the developers wish 3.0 had been. �Part > of the problem was that not enough people downloaded and tested the 3.0 > betas to discover certain problems before the release.
That's the old chicken/egg question. People who depend on third party libraries can't test beta versions of 3.0, can they? Nothing anybody can do anything about, just a comment. > > �> so I been silently waking for 3.1 to go final > > > before spending time with the 3 branch to learn the changes. > > You will, of course, then have to take what you get ;-). �If you have > any unusual uses, please consider trying them out on a beta release. > > tjr -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
