On Mar 7, 10:39 pm, Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote: > Aaron Brady wrote: > > Hi. Just bringing it up again. I feel the docs should mention it at > > least, and there should possibly be a separate function. > > Post a bug report or feature request on the tracker, or nothing will happen. > > If you include a patch, odds of it being approved are greatly increased. > > -- > Steven
I'm not quite sure how to handle it. The existing function is useful, widely used, and misnamed. The existing calls should call the auxiliary function, and RichCompareBool should get a new implementation. Actually, I question whether all of them are correctly calling the auxiliary anyway. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
