robert.mull...@gmail.com wrote: > I understand the method, but when you say you "count one DEDENT for > each level" > well lets say you counted 3 of them. Do you have a way to interject 3 > consecutive > DEDENT tokens into the token stream so that the parser receives them > before it > receives the next real token?
i don't know any details of your lexer, but perhaps you could emit a single token that included the current value (DEDENTS, 3) for example. then it would only require a very simple wrapper around the lexer to convert that into three tokens. in that way you would stay with a machine-generated lexer and parser, with just a simple hand-written shim between them. andrew -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
