On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 13:42 +0200, Diez B. Roggisch wrote: > wdveloper wrote: > > > Hi there, > > > > I need to make xml transformation using XSLT 2.0 (since i want to use > > the powerful tag <xsl:result-document> to produce multiple files). > > In your experience, which kind of library out there is better? > > XSLT is a standard, so if you find a library that implements it, there > shouldn't be much differences. > > Having said that, these days lxml2 is the craze, and it contains > xslt-processing. It would be my first (and hopefully last) stop. > > Diez
While I firmly believe lxml is the best python XML library available, being built on libxml2 means that it only supports XSLT 1.0. As far as I know, if you want 2.0 support, you still need to be using one of the Java XSLT processors. -- John Krukoff <jkruk...@ltgc.com> Land Title Guarantee Company -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list