Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2009 16:21:19 +1200, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
... (0) "Opposite" is not well-defined unless you have a dichotomy. In the
... (1/3) Why do you jump to the conclusion that "pi=3" implies that only
... (1/2) If you "get rid of real numbers", then obviously you must have a
... (2/3) There is *no* point (2/3).
... (1) I thought about numbering my points as consecutive increasing
integers, but decided that was an awfully boring convention. A shiny
banananana for the first person to recognise the sequence.
I'd call it F_3, but using a Germanic F (Farey sequence limit 3).
Do I get a banana or one with a few more ans?
--Scott David Daniels
scott.dani...@acm.org
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
