In message <003b3d8c$0$9673$c3e8...@news.astraweb.com>, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Fri, 29 May 2009 14:00:19 +1200, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > >> In message <003af57e$0$9673$c3e8...@news.astraweb.com>, Steven D'Aprano >> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 29 May 2009 09:04:39 +1200, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>> >>>> In message <003a5518$0$9673$c3e8...@news.astraweb.com>, Steven >>>> D'Aprano wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, 28 May 2009 20:58:07 +1200, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In message <0039e83c$0$9673$c3e8...@news.astraweb.com>, Steven >>>>>> D'Aprano wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> A good UI standard should mean that: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * all functionality should be discoverable without reading the >>>>>>> manual; >>>>>> >>>>>> Which means no scripting languages are allowed? >>>>> >>>>> "Should", not "must". >>>> >>>> If you meant "may or may not", why don't you say "may or may not"? >>> >>> "Should" does not mean "may or may not". >> >> I'm not sure how there is supposed to be a difference in this context. >> "All people should fly by flapping their arms, except where this is >> physically impossible". You're asking for something that is infeasible >> with most current editors, if not all of them. > > On the remote chance that you're not trolling, I deny that > discoverablity is "infeasible" ... On the remote chance you're not trolling, let me point out politely that it is for scriptability. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
