On Jun 17, 10:23 am, Mensanator <mensana...@aol.com> wrote: > On Jun 17, 11:59 am, Aaron Brady <castiro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 17, 1:44 am, Steven D'Aprano > > > <ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au> wrote: > > > On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:46:14 -0700, William Clifford wrote: > > > > I was staring at a logic table the other day, and I asked myself, "what > > > > if one wanted to play with exotic logics; how might one do it?" > > > > This might be useful for you, and if not useful, at least it might blow > > > your mind like it did mine. > > > > (This is not original to me -- I didn't create it. However, I can't find > > > the original source.) > > > > Imagine for a moment that there are no boolean values. > > > There are no numbers. They were never invented. > > > There are no classes. > > > There are no objects. > > > There are only functions. > > > > Could you define functions that act like boolean values? And could you > > > define other functions to operate on them? > > > snip > > > I think high and low /voltages/, though continuous and approximate, > > might satisfy this. > > > There are no such things as electrons, > > I've got a Tesla coil if you'd like to meet some electrons personally.
The Wall Street Journal ran an article about Asian pleasure markets; they provide a-- quote-- "perfectly reasonable professional option". -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
