On Jul 10, 10:26 am, Chris Withers <[email protected]> wrote: > Inky 788 wrote: > > Currently, distutils itself is being actively developed. More info > > about this here:http://tarekziade.wordpress.com/ > > > My (albeit anonymous) advice is: use distutils. Manually download > > packages as-needed from PyPI and install manually using standard > > distutils. > > No thanks. I'm a big fan of buildout. Making it possible for packages to > specify their dependencies is a big win...
Yup, it's a big win. But package installation for Python is a bit of a mess right now. Neither setuptools nor buildout (nor pip for that matter) are a standard part of Python. It's rather silly that although Python is a batteries-included language, and it's mid-2009, and Python 3.1 has been released, that Python *still* doesn't have a standard built-in way to handle package installation (including dependencies and uninstallation). My guess is that once distutils finishes getting spruced up, some intrepid hacker is going to: * take the best parts of pip and the best parts of setuptools (I don't know anything about buildout), * stir vigorously, * ruthlessly remove the excess pieces, * write good documentation for it, * throw the result up on github/launchpad/bitbucket/whatever, and then *that's* what everyone's going to start using and which will eventually make it into the Python std lib. But that's just my anon 2 cents. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
