Michael Ströder wrote:
Thorsten Kampe wrote:
* Michael Ströder (Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:26:09 +0200)
timeit.Timer("unicode('äöüÄÖÜß','utf-8')").timeit(10000000)
17.23644495010376
timeit.Timer("'äöüÄÖÜß'.decode('utf8')").timeit(10000000)
72.087096929550171
That is significant! So the winner is:
unicode('äöüÄÖÜß','utf-8')
Unless you are planning to write a loop that decodes "äöüÄÖÜß" one
million times, these benchmarks are meaningless.
Well, I can tell you I would not have posted this here and checked it if it
would be meaningless for me. You don't have to read and answer this thread if
it's meaningless to you.
Ciao, Michael.
I believe that the comment "these benchmarks are meaningless" refers to
the length of the strings being used in the tests. Surely something
involving thousands or millions of characters is more meaningful? Or to
go the other way, you are unlikely to write
for c in 'äöüÄÖÜß':
u = unicode(c, 'utf-8')
...
Yes?
--
Kindest regards.
Mark Lawrence.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
