exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
There's a lot of things in Python that I don't strictly *need*. That doesn't mean that they wouldn't be welcome if I could have them. Getting rid of the range/xrange dichotomy would improve things.
The developers agreed a couple of years ago. Starting using 3.1 if you want this.
Since 'range' could refer to a user-defined object, rather than the builtin function, there is no way the interpreter should substitute 'xrange'.
tjr -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
