James Harris wrote:...
Another option:
0.(2:1011), 0.(8:7621), 0.(16:c26b)
where the three characters "0.(" begin the sequence.
Comments? Improvements?
I did a little interpreter where non-base 10 numbers
(up to base 36) were:
.7.100 == 64 (octal)
.9.100 == 100 (decimal)
.F.100 == 256 (hexadecimal)
.1.100 == 4 (binary)
.3.100 == 9 (trinary)
.Z.100 == 46656 (base 36)
Advantages:
Tokenizer can recognize chunks easily.
Not visually too confusing,
No issue of what base the base indicator is expressed in.
--Scott David Daniels
scott.dani...@acm.org
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
