>>>>> Scott David Daniels <scott.dani...@acm.org> (SDD) wrote:
>SDD> James Harris wrote:...
>>> Another option:
>>>
>>> 0.(2:1011), 0.(8:7621), 0.(16:c26b)
>>>
>>> where the three characters "0.(" begin the sequence.
>>>
>>> Comments? Improvements?
>SDD> I did a little interpreter where non-base 10 numbers
>SDD> (up to base 36) were:
>SDD> .7.100 == 64 (octal)
>SDD> .9.100 == 100 (decimal)
>SDD> .F.100 == 256 (hexadecimal)
>SDD> .1.100 == 4 (binary)
>SDD> .3.100 == 9 (trinary)
>SDD> .Z.100 == 46656 (base 36)
I wonder how you wrote that interpreter, given that some answers are wrong.
--
Piet van Oostrum <p...@cs.uu.nl>
URL: http://pietvanoostrum.com [PGP 8DAE142BE17999C4]
Private email: p...@vanoostrum.org
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
