J. Cliff Dyer <j...@sdf.lonestar.org> wrote: > I had an objection to using spaces in numeric literals last time around > and it still stands, and it still stands in the new one. >
Or, we can use U+00A0 NO-BREAK SPACE, once we already have unicode variable names :-) (probably some people would find it difficult to type, though with my keyboard layout it is COMPOSE + SPACE + SPACE, not more difficult than _). Well, reading code listings could be a bit confusing. Thinking about it, U+2005 FOUR-PER-EM SPACE makes more sense. Aesthetically, too :-) -- ----------------------------------------------------------- | Radovan Garabík http://kassiopeia.juls.savba.sk/~garabik/ | | __..--^^^--..__ garabik @ kassiopeia.juls.savba.sk | ----------------------------------------------------------- Antivirus alert: file .signature infected by signature virus. Hi! I'm a signature virus! Copy me into your signature file to help me spread! -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
