On Sep 14, 9:23 am, Christopher Culver <crcul...@christopherculver.com> wrote: (snip) > That researcher does not say that language *constrains* thought, which > was the assertion of the OP and of the strict form of the Sapir-Whorf > hypothesis. She merely says that it may influence thought.
*I* am the OP! I never said language constrained thought or intelligence, that's lunacy! That would be akin to saying class status decides intelligence! You should reread this thread immediately! My argument is multi-languages and the loss of communication, and obviously we have before us an example of this miss-communication. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
