On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Victor Subervi <victorsube...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hmm. I didn't bother to look at the "comparison post". The indenting looks > right to me. I reread my post and I believe my question is straight-forward. > The crux of the issue is my sentence at the bottom. I believe that details > what my objective is. Not sure what I should do here. I hope you can clarify > what it is you want me to clarify. > He was complaining not about your post but a rather extended response Dennis made to you while trying to help. Which is a particularly asshatish thing to do, but hey. Dennis's response isn't really my style of using SQL in Python, but its perfectly legible and understandable -- both in GMail where I usually read, and via the link r provided to prove his point, which it doesn't at all. It looks fine in both. Either way, I basically do it just the same way Dennis did-- so did that solve your question? A little bit of table redesign and then recursive calls between the "items" and "relationships" tables. --S
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
