On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:04 AM, rh0dium <steven.kl...@gmail.com> wrote: [snip] > > > Now the real question I have on this is scalability. The real
What you're describing isn't "scalability". It could be called "extensibility". > advantage to using *args and **kwargs is that down the road (through > inheritance/polymorphism) I may not know what I'm being given (isn't > that the essence of duck-typing). My long standing belief is that by > using *args and **kwargs I plan for future additions with minimal > changes to my code. So doesn't restricting this just defeat the > purpose? YAGNI? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
