Uuuuh. Thanks! V On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:45 AM, sstein...@gmail.com <sstein...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Nov 9, 2009, at 10:41 AM, Victor Subervi wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:29 AM, sstein...@gmail.com > <sstein...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> On Nov 9, 2009, at 10:18 AM, Victor Subervi wrote: >> >> Yes, obviously. But if CGI is enabled, it should work anyway, should it >>> not? >>> >> >> Depends on what "CGI is enabled" means. >> >> Usually, web servers are not set to just handle cgi scripts from anywhere, >> but only from specific file system locations. Otherwise, an an anonymous >> upload could be executed as CGI and wreak havoc. >> > > Of course, yes. > >> >> And "it should work anyway, should it not" is already answered by "they're >> having trouble getting my scripts to work." >> > > They're having _all_sorts_of_trouble_ getting my scripts to work, not just > this issue. These scripts worked fine on another server. I don't understand > what the problems are, and I'm trying to parameterize. > > > Gotcha. > > Do you have access to and have you given them the old httpd.conf? > > That could certainly give them some clues about what's different. > > Also, there is (on apache 2.x+ anyway) a whole directory tree full of > included files that get sucked in as the configuration is getting built so > that whole tree would give them everything they would need (if they know how > to work from it which they should if they're running a "server farm"). > > S > >
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
