In article <58e5cd75-75be-4785-8e79-490364396...@e31g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>, davidj411 <davidj...@gmail.com> wrote: > >i was also thinking about using SQL Lite with one DB to store all the >info. with this option, i would not have to worry about concurrent >updates, but as the file size increases, i could expect performance to >suffer again?
Depends what you mean by "suffer". Performance always decreases as size gets larger unless you take specific steps (such as better algorithms or bigger hardware). Using indexes should give SQLite reasonable performance; you can always upgrade to a faster SQL implementation or switch to another kind of storage. But honestly, until you get to millions of records, you should be fine with SQLite. -- Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ The best way to get information on Usenet is not to ask a question, but to post the wrong information. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
