n00m: > my home tests proved Python is a fellow fast beast of C++. > Quite unexpected (I expected Py would be by ~10 times slower). > PS > Both my codes are identical in their algorithms.
> ============================= > 0.016 0.0150001049042 <--- exec times Maybe in your C++ code there's something that can be improved, this is a 1:1 translation to D (V.1) language (using dlibs) and it's about 2.2 times faster than the Psyco version: http://codepad.org/MQLj0ydB Using a smarter usage of memory (that is avoiding all or most memory allocations inside all loops), the performance difference will surely grow. Bye, bearophile -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
