On Dec 3, 3:22 pm, Nobody <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote: > On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:55:19 +0000, r0g wrote: > > I have to recommend to opposite, stick with wx. What's the point of > > tying yourself into GTK when wx works on Mac, PC and Linux? > > The main drawbacks are that wxWidgets sucks compared to GTK or Qt (mostly > due to being modelled on the Win32 API, which itself sucks compared to > most Unix/X11 toolkits), and that wxPython is woefully under-documented > (whereas PyGTK is better documented than GTK itself). > > But if you need portability, wxPython is the way to go.
There is currently an on-going documentation initiative going on for wxPython. Robin Dunn is doing some work on it that will allow much easier documentation patching (as I understand it), so that should get better. Also, I am slowly working my way through wxPython many widgets and doing tutorials on them on my blog, which I then stick in the official wxPython wiki if I think the article is good enough. ------------------- Mike Driscoll Blog: http://blog.pythonlibrary.org -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list