If your scheme flies, would it be practicable to use the same syntax as a range generator?range(i, j, k) => i:j:k so range(10, 2) => :10:2 i.e. we could write for i in :10:2: or the more common: range(10) => :10
Ugh. Magic characters. Let's not. -- Rhodri James *-* Wildebeest Herder to the Masses -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
