In article <[email protected]>,
Gregory Ewing  <[email protected]> wrote:
>MRAB wrote:
>>
>> In simple cases you might be replacing with the same string every time,
>> but other cases you might want the replacement to contain substrings
>> captured by the regex.
>
>But you can give it a function that has access to the match object and
>can produce whatever replacement string it wants.

Assuming I remember correctly, the function capability came after the
replacement capability.  I think that breaking replacement would be a
Bad Idea.
-- 
Aahz ([email protected])           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/

Weinberg's Second Law: If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote 
programs, then the first woodpecker that came along would destroy civilization.
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to