On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:35:20 -0800, Patrick Maupin wrote: > Yes, it is very confusing. Steven used that purported argument against > me, and then since I disagreed with it, it apparently meant that I was > arguing that changing the file extension type (which I've never even > proposed or discussed, btw) from json to rson
My argument is *figurative*, not literal. > somehow magically makes a preexisting file all better. You might not have intended that ludicrous conclusion, but it was implied by some of your posts, particularly the early ones. Of course I don't think that you *actually* believe the conclusion. I believe that, whatever the real or imagined benefit of RSON over JSON, in this thread you have attempted to over-sell RSON while giving relatively little justification for it. I wish you every success in your project, but think that it is off-topic for a Python discussion group. -- Steven -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
